Well, since Emelya posted a topic about "WHY SKYREM IS NOT BLAH BLAH", then I decided to express your personal opinion about Battlefield 3. No. It’s not in the spirit of smoking something? but just your personal opinion! Yes, and I didn’t want to cause at least some fuss among the wild fans.
Well, everyone knows Battlefield and how huge the maps are, and how much equipment there is and team play right under your nose. And recently they even added destructibility and juicy graphics. And to this they added a single-player campaign, and it seems to be not entirely slag but quite playable with four colorful characters and Harry Potter in the role of Sergeant Yu.WITH. Army. And don’t say it’s bad. No. Very fresh and cool. In the realm of DICE singles, of course.
But that’s why we love Battlefield, son? Yes, for multiplayer and it was for them that the game paved its way in the gaming industry… blah blah blah. To the point, in short.
Back in 2002, the first part was released and the series evolved with each release of a new game in this series. Each game had something of its own that drew the player in for a long time and seriously. And there were quite a few such “somethings”. A real breakthrough was made by Battlefield 2, which had everything: a lot of equipment, pumping, a sea of weapons, spacious maps, your teamplay and a lot of other juicy things.
With the release of games under the Bad Company series, developers paid attention to destructibility. Everyone has probably seen the Arica Harbor video, where at the end of the video the house folded like a card. Yes, and the buildings on other maps were such that they could easily be destroyed for many tactical and non-tactical techniques, such as smoking out a sniper or machine gunner, by exploding the wall against which he stands, and so on. Even looking at a battlefield with holes in the wall is more pleasant than looking at a wall with a black trace of an explosion. And so, when you play by yourself, you even want to destroy something, so as not to look for a workaround and be LIKE A BOSS. That is, there is no such thing that a bunch of soldiers are looking for a detour so that they can fall into the house and clear it. Is it just stealth mode?.
What about Battlefield 3?? The developers fed us colorful videos of single and multiplayer, after which we already wanted to get the game and start playing, damn them. And I was there, and I drank honey there… It would seem that DICE moved away from experiments and took up a full-fledged continuation of the second, wonderful Battlefield 2. And what did the developers focus on this time?? Well, just like that, let’s immediately remember what they talked about in all sorts of diaries and interviews? Graphics, lighting, Frostbite 2.0 and the return of 64 people paired with fighters. No, there’s nothing wrong with that. Personally, I thought this would be a game that was at least five years old, after hundreds of hours of playing Bad Company 2 multiplayer.
Dirty girl
Thank https://lopebetcasino.co.uk/games/ God they installed a normal weapon for the rank of “Recruit”, and not some kind of plastic fart or spew gun with a silencer. This, of course, makes me happy that at least it has become easier to kill level 30 enemies. This is where DICE fixed a serious bug.
But they also added fighters to the game to make the battles brighter. But why did they add upgrades for planes?? WELL WHY? Did they think that an incredible number of people would buy their game and they would all level up together?? Well okay. And they thought about other clients? About those who bought the game much later, in December… later in short.
They gave a man Battlefield 3 for the New Year. He happily goes and installs it and finally enters the game itself. He sees the plane free and runs to board it. sat down and burned into it and took off. He sees a tank, but cannot fire a rocket because IT IS NOT AVAILABLE! We sat on his tail and here ordinary maneuvers cannot throw off the enemy. Let *some crap out of your tail*. But no, SHE IS NOT HERE TOO.
And this is what comes out. You need to somehow pump up your plane yourself and level up to the level of *men of the 50th level*. But you only have a tattered machine gun. Get out yourself, bro, yourself. This is Battlefield 3 after all. A realistic shooter from 2011, where you need to upgrade planes and, after jumping out of a helicopter, you can jump into another helicopter, having first killed the pilot of this machine.
Here’s more. Cards. After all, spacious, well-thought-out maps are one thing, and a field with two houses is another. I won’t say that the maps in Battlefield 3 are bad. No. They are really good there, but I can say one thing with confidence: DICE needs to learn how to make maps where battles take place in the city itself, like “Crossing the Senna”. Firstly, it is not clear what is being destroyed, what is being partially destroyed and what is completely. In Conquest mode, respawns were generally found everywhere. I was killed, appeared at the very left base, which was being stormed by enemies, and I was immediately killed. Where are yours?? Our people are generally rushing out of nowhere, knocking out their opponents from their base with all their might, and they throw you into a complete ass.
And you say:
— So join someone’s squad, you will also fight!
And I will answer:
— Then why did you remove the check mark for “settlement” in the squad during loading?? Why do you need to go inside the game menu and look for a free squad against the backdrop of a wavering, blue background??"
Why the hell should this feature be removed??
There is also such a thing as Battlelog and game settings.
Why the hell did the developers make graphical, and not only, game settings during the game itself?? First of all, I have to wait 30 minutes (namely 4-6 after the last patch) for the map to load, hide somewhere and already set up the game. What if the process takes a little longer?? It’s not impossible, though? So what then? They will kick you from the server and look for the server again, wait 5 minutes and do everything again in the “x3 speed” mode. Comfortable? I’m freaking out how.
Battlelog. He’s still slag. Everyone has already heard about him and there’s no point in talking about him, is there??
Akashiro once said, “We are fans of BF3. There are only a few of us, but we have a friendly team, pubs on Sundays and blah blah blah.”. Thank you, I laughed. If he had written this a couple of years ago, I would have agreed, but now… Where exactly there is such an audience is in really hardcore games or the like, like Arma, Operation Flashpoint, etc.d. And now BF3 is a stupidly promoted project and it’s stupid to talk about some kind of “friendly” audience.
The mechanics of the game have also changed a lot compared to Bad Company 2. Battles have become faster and more dynamic. Yes, this is of course a plus, but there are also more opportunities for lone-wolfing. That is, now one player can easily run around and crush enemies with backstabs and the like. Was it possible to do this in previous parts of the series?? Not 100% sure Yes, for one soldier to run through enemy territory? Yes, he should have been Rambo at least. It’s no good, it’s no good.
But you say teamplay, teamplay. Yes, there is no teamplay there. NO! Yes, if a team gets together and communicates and coordinates their actions through TeamSpeak, then yes. And so, at the beginning of the round: almost everyone runs to the planes, helicopters. When all the places are filled, they decide to run to the cars and tanks. And then bam and they are already busy. On foot or on foot. Okay. Everyone runs wherever they see. And this is teamplay? Incredibly captivating.
Yes, Rush mode has your teamplay. But sorry, teams have only one task – to attack/defend. Then in the same Modern Warfare, in the Search&Destroy mode, there is also teamplay. In Mount&Blade Warband, in the Siege mode, there is also teamplay, because you need to either capture the castle or defend it. What’s wrong?
But the game has graphics. Yes, the graphics are not simple, but downright cool, but you also need a pretty good computer for it to play smoothly. And it seemed to play fine, of course with small brakes, but it played. And after the penultimate patch the game just flew, so much so that I couldn’t be happier that BF3 runs smoothly on my PC. BUT!
This is how crooked programmers you need to be to make an update to improve optimization, which worsened performance significantly. It became impossible to play, and the map loading time increased from 2 minutes to 4-6 minutes. Oh how good it is! And I got to the point where I sold my account because of this. Bravo DICE!
And flashlights were screwed into the game everywhere, because the lighting in the game is so cool, thanks to the new engine. Only these flashlights were used to make real spotlights, when on the Caspian Border the enemy, or one of his own, sculpts you with light until “I can’t”. Extremely realistic. Well at least they fixed it.
I’m not saying that the game is crap and the like, I just expressed why I don’t like this game, from a bunch of unnecessary innovations. And also from the noise that the game made (like Skyrim). I’ve played almost every Battlefield game and I know the difference. And I was really drawn into Battlefield 2 and Bad Company 2, which are simply awesome, but also have their own completely different advantages, which make me want to return to the game more than once.
If you think that MW3 is a wanker, then please visit my profile and see how much I have played in MW3 in a week and since the release of the game itself. Please.